Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Another option would be that more users make their publications > available as open source. AFAIK the UniCMS and Unipublic publications > used to be very popular to get started with Lenya.
there's certainly no harm in that. the only problem i see is that people tend to do inelegant, hackish things in real-life deployments that might not be good examples and could become a legacy eventually... in any case we should clean up the example publication (no more tables etc. - or is that already done?), and expose more features. would you guys be ok with a very rudimentary "basic" publication that contains only the bare minimum of lenya features with only the fully modularized, best-practice features (which currently excludes bxe and kupu), and base the example publication on that (adding bxe/kupu hacks locally)? -- Jörn Nettingsmeier "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
