HI again
No! This workaround would only work on a random basis.
There is no defined order for the calls to the spellchecker.
Even though most applications probably iterate word-by-word
you have to consider that other documants may be spelled at
the same time and thus one call may be for one document
and the second call for the other one.
i would have expect that is was document-based
And if you consider a server with multiple users it becomes
even more unpredictable.
Really ? the spellchecker code execution is shared throughout users ?
Also e.g. the Writer keeps a list of (still) misspelled words
and may like to check only those that are listed there.
And there is no rule for the order of those entries or in
which order they got inserted as well.
Thus relying on the order of the calls is very unreliable.
ok, if it has been designed like that
so back to the initial question
how is it possible to underline the words ?
With that is think i could manage to process with a cursor (real time
with a keboard event) - no use of spellchecker
i'm a bit disapointed though regarding spellchecker implementation.
Thanks a lot
Laurent
--
Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org
Indesko >> http://www.indesko.com
Nuxeo CPS >> http://www.nuxeo.com - http://www.cps-project.org
Livre "Programmation OpenOffice.org", Eyrolles 2004
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
