Lars Aronsson wrote: > Does the DicOOo mechanism change in 2.1, 2.2 or 2.3 so that it > becomes more automated and streamlined?
IMHO a better approach would be to deploy dictionaries as extensions and in case they rely on a particular spell checker in the installation use a dependency on it or at least the OOo version to make sure that the extension is only installed if this spell checker is available. Unfortunately the dictionary handling currently has some bugs wrt. to extendability (if missing support for something can be seen as a bug) that have to be fixed. But if this could help to solve this and similar problems in the future and if Laurent had some time to help us with the DicOOo wizard we could think about giving this a higher priority. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
