HI
Does the DicOOo mechanism change in 2.1, 2.2 or 2.3 so that it
becomes more automated and streamlined?
IMHO a better approach would be to deploy dictionaries as extensions and
in case they rely on a particular spell checker in the installation use
a dependency on it or at least the OOo version to make sure that the
extension is only installed if this spell checker is available.
as told before, i agree
Unfortunately the dictionary handling currently has some bugs wrt. to
extendability (if missing support for something can be seen as a bug)
that have to be fixed. But if this could help to solve this and similar
problems in the future and if Laurent had some time to help us with the
DicOOo wizard we could think about giving this a higher priority.
i experience very hard times these days
i'll be oin vacation next week and try to do something at DicOOo level
- modify DicOOo for being able to distinguish between mySpell and
hunspell (probably 2 lists maintained in a first shoot as for thesaurus)
Laci, what is the service to check for to be sure Hunspell is installed ?
- upload the dictionary (perharsps even before)
regarding the process to download manually dictionaries, we have the
same problem in French sue to licencing issues
user do not complain that much (but some, yes, complain)
More next week
Laurent
--
Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org -
http://www.indesko.com
Nuxeo Enterprise Content Management >> http://www.nuxeo.com -
http://www.nuxeo.org
Livre "Programmation OpenOffice.org", Eyrolles 2004-2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
