On Wednesday 25 July 2007 09:22, Simon Brouwer wrote: > > HYPH de AT hyph_de_DE > > > > No need for duplication I think. > > Are you sure that this doesn't simply (and redundantly) load the same > dictionary into memory for de-AT as well?
Sorry, I overlooked you were concerned about *memory* overhead. I'm not sure how this is handled. I guess it's loaded twice. Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
