Op Vrydag 03-08-2007 om 15:52 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Stefan Baltzer: > Hi, Friedel! > > Thanks a lot. That looks great! > The "simple metrics" you use is what I thought about... > > <Quote> > Excellent - you can safely use this for all spell checking > Very good - there are a few minor corner cases or situations with > aglutenated words that will be missed > Good - very good coverage, but some obvious words will be missing > Basic - not good enough for general spell checking. Useful for those > who wish to help advance the spell checker to the next level. > <Quote> > > I put that page in my bookmark collection and get back to this after my > vacation. > > Regards > Stefan >
Glad you like these. Actually what I was referring to were number metrics - ways to measure performance objectively. The schema above is a good classification for users, but in order to decide in which class a checker is, one would need some way to measure it, I guess. Not that anybody would agree on the meaning of the numbers, but at least it gives a way to track progress and to compare different checkers in the same language. Keep well Friedel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
