Nicolas Mailhot schrieb: > That's completely true on the 'no building or packaging' side. On the > 'just give access' side, distributors prefer regular versioned archive > dumps on an ftp/http:
OK, I will put this information into the ongoing discussion about possible changes of our build environment, packaging etc. I still don't understand why providing rpms or debs directly isn't acceptable but I don't need to understand everything. ;-) Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
