Hi Mathias, Within a few days I will send an extended (for morphological generation and better stemming) version. Thanks for your help.
Regards, László 2008/12/5 Mathias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi László, > > in case you don't plan to extend the dictionary for the 3.1 release, we > can at least update the bundled extension and make sure that it is the > same as in the repository. As I have a CWS with updated and new > dictionaries for 3.1 I could volunteer to do that. > > Regards, > Mathias > > Németh László wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I will make a new en_US dictionary based on Kevin's new data, also a > > new CWS for the en_US dictionary upgrade. I have no information about > > the status of the en_US extension, but you are right, it would be fine > > to maintain the extension as official release. The main goal of the > > planned dictionary upgrade is extending the dictionary with > > morphological data for better thesaurus usage and it depends from the > > CWS hunspell4thesaurus integration (I wait for the respond of the QA, > > see > http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300%2Fhunspell4thesaurus > ). > > > > Best regards, > > László > > > > 2008/11/27 Robert Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I Just wanted to say this is great news that an official English > >> dictionaries update will be maintained on the Extensions website. > >> > >> I had a user ask me recently on the community forums how they could get > an > >> English dictionary because they lived in France and had that version of > the > >> installer. I ended up just privately sending them the extension that is > >> unpacked in the install directory, and only realised then that this was > a > >> bit of loophole. > >> > >> Regards > >> Robert Black > >> > >> 2008/11/27 Marcin Miłkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>> Kevin Atkinson pisze: > >>> > >>> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Marcin Mikowski wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Kevin Atkinson pisze: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Kevin Atkinson wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Marcin Mi?kowski wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> who is responsible now for maintaining the official en_US > dictionary > >>>>>>>> for OOo? There is an extension on the extension website but it's a > bit older > >>>>>>>> than the version distributed with OOo, so it cannot be considered > an update > >>>>>>>> (it also has a wrong version scheme). Ideally, the extension > should become a > >>>>>>>> bit more official (so that the maintainer could be assigned issues > in IZ to > >>>>>>>> update it) and the dictionary should be brought in sync with the > current > >>>>>>>> distributed version (I've just found an error in it - it contains > a > >>>>>>>> non-dictionary word 'underly' that is absent in all spelling > dictionaries I > >>>>>>>> have access to - or marked as a typo). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I am responsible for the contents of the dictionary but Németh > László < > >>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> is responsible for actually creating the > >>>>>>> release. See "Additional Information" at > >>>>>>> http://wordlist.sourceforge.net/. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Until a new official dictionary (or extension) is released you can > use > >>>>>> en en_US dictionary I created for Mozilla which you can find > attached to > >>>>>> this bug report: > >>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397150 > >>>>>> or download it directly: > >>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=290079 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am going to email Németh László to work out how to create new > official > >>>>>> dictionary. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> As far as I understand the new process, it should be created as an > >>>>> extension. The problem is that there is already an en-US dictionary > >>>>> extension there, so you might want to contact its maintainer to make > him/her > >>>>> responsible for updates (as Laci seems to be sufficiently busy doing > lots of > >>>>> work on hunspell). > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> And how will I do that, he does not provide any way to contact him > that I > >>>> can see other than posting a public comment (and yes I logged in). > >>>> > >>> > >>> I've checked the ID of the extension offered - it's not the same as the > >>> official dicts: org.openoffice.en.hunspell.dictionaries, so another, > >>> official English dictionary extension can be built by the official > >>> maintainers, which is you, Laci, or anyone else you think fit for the > role. > >>> It would be then picked up during update, and, according to the plan > that > >>> was posted here on this list some time ago, the extensions will be > >>> automatically updated in OOo (=added to the source codebase) based on > the > >>> extension website in the future. > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Marcin > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >> > > > -- > Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer > OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS > Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". > I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
