Hi, 2009/1/5 F Wolff <[email protected]>: > Németh, the ICONV solution sounds interesting, and I guess would work. I > don't know if that would then also work in Firefox. (Do they update
In fact, development version of Firefox has already contained Hunspell 1.2.8, unlike OpenOffice.org. > their copy of Hunspell from time to time?) Automatic conversion means > that people would benefit from the normalisation even if the spell > checker authors didn't think about the problem, which is probably ideal. > I can't image there being a very large overhead for this, although it > probably won't come for free either. I thought of only an automatic preprocessor utility, based on Unicode canonical and compatibility equivalence data. A preprocessed dictionary can use only a small subset of this data without any extra overhead. Regards, László > > Friedel > > > > -- > Recently on my blog: > http://translate.org.za/blogs/friedel/en/content/re-bringing-all-translation-management-tools-together > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
