Olivier R. wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thomas Lange - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg a écrit : > >> If anyone still has a dictionary update that should be integrated into >> OOo 3.2 please file an issue and attach the respective files. >> You may assign the issue directly to me (tl). >> >> It would be best if the issues got submitted at this Sunday evening at >> latest, because than I could integrate all of them in the same CWS I >> currently have at hand. >> >> As for dictionaries for new language that are not already in the source >> tree: I can not promise that they will be added in time for 3.2 since >> there has to be some legal review for those. > > I installed OOo 3.2 DEV300m60, and I noticed that the French > dictionaries extension was an old one (v2.3.3), whereas the version > included in OOo 3.1 was the version 3.2.0. > Why such a regression?
In OOo 3.0 we integrated 2.3.3: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91426 Probably the newer dictionary version was integrated on the OOO310 branch only, but not on the DEV300 branch that now became the OOO320 branch. Thanks for letting us know that. Regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "nospamfor...@gmx.de". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lingucomponent.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lingucomponent.openoffice.org
