Yes, I think that should be the way forward instead. It seems to me that introducing a special error name for the most basic and generic <error> would be like putting the cart before the horse. We should rather fix the validators that don't have those features yet.
David Am 11.07.2008 um 19:05 schrieb mugeso: > If you mean that, > I think some validators such as AgaviRegexValidator should be fix. > They don't specify why the error happens. > > David Zülke wrote: >> The general idea is that validators have specific error message code >> for actual problems encountered during validation. Examples are "min" >> and "max" in the string validator. The generic <error> then serves as >> the "you need to enter this" message. >> >> Or did I understand something wrong? >> >> >> David > > _______________________________________________ > Agavi Dev Mailing List > [email protected] > http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ Agavi Dev Mailing List [email protected] http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
