On Jul 14, 2008, at 5:50 PM, David Zülke wrote: > Humm. Okay. I can see the point there. Can do. > > > David > > > P.S: I'm beginning to dislike the fact that you win every single one > of these arguments :>>>> >
It's because I'm the guy who has to fight the framework in multiple projects ;) But there is far less to fight about than with other frameworks, which is a good thing. cheers felix > > > > > > Am 14.07.2008 um 11:22 schrieb Felix Gilcher: > >> My case is not that a validator that does not allow setting specific >> error messages, I want to validate a file and errors out with a >> generic message on >> >> - too large >> - too small >> - PHP Upload error >> - ... >> >> But I want to provide a more specific message on >> >> - not provided by the user >> >> I can do that currently by setting my generic message to all the >> specific cases that I do not want to cover and then setting my >> specific message to the generic 'error'. That seems like the wrong >> way round to me, 'not there' is a specific case like all other cases, >> the generic case is 'something went wrong, but we don't know what'. >> >> Cheers >> >> felix >> >> >> On Jul 12, 2008, at 1:29 PM, David Zülke wrote: >> >>> Yes, I think that should be the way forward instead. It seems to me >>> that introducing a special error name for the most basic and generic >>> <error> would be like putting the cart before the horse. We should >>> rather fix the validators that don't have those features yet. >>> >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 11.07.2008 um 19:05 schrieb mugeso: >>> >>>> If you mean that, >>>> I think some validators such as AgaviRegexValidator should be fix. >>>> They don't specify why the error happens. >>>> >>>> David Zülke wrote: >>>>> The general idea is that validators have specific error message >>>>> code >>>>> for actual problems encountered during validation. Examples are >>>>> "min" >>>>> and "max" in the string validator. The generic <error> then >>>>> serves as >>>>> the "you need to enter this" message. >>>>> >>>>> Or did I understand something wrong? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> David >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Agavi Dev Mailing List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Agavi Dev Mailing List >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Agavi Dev Mailing List >> [email protected] >> http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Agavi Dev Mailing List > [email protected] > http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ Agavi Dev Mailing List [email protected] http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
