true true. > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ 'Snake' Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 July 2002 16:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance > > > yeah but ur just an impatient bugger > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 July 2002 15:56 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance > > > Because it annoys the shit out of me in mx. > > Ignore the fact that clients will rarely see it, as a > developer, I for one > hate having to sit there for 5 minutes whilst it compiles the > page into > class files. > > > (slightly exaggerated) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 25 July 2002 16:05 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance > > > > > > Why would page compile time be an issue? > > > > Genuinely curious. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 25 July 2002 16:48 > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance > > > > > > > > > > Also, I'd be more than happy to get all the new features with > > > > zero speed > > > > increase. > > > > > > this is what I'm happy about. I was expecting a speed decrease. > > > > > > They didn't mention anything in those reports about page > > > compile time though. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 25 July 2002 15:57 > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance > > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't looked too hard at those benchmarks, but the stuff > > > > I'm writing > > > > is so much faster in CFMX that you can't really compare it > > > to CF 5 or > > > > 4.5. As with most things, relative performance between > > > > versions depends > > > > on what the app is doing. > > > > > > > > Also, I'd be more than happy to get all the new features with > > > > zero speed > > > > increase. > > > > > > > > Spike > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Russ 'Snake' Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: 25 July 2002 16:53 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really not very impressive is it. I thought performance was > > > > > meant to be miles better. Looks like Linux version now beats > > > > > windows version. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: 25 July 2002 15:21 > > > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > > Subject: [ cf-dev ] CFMX performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for those not on the cf-talk list: > > > > > > > > > > performance comparison data has finally been release > > > > > comparing cfmx vs cf5 vs cf4.5 performance times. > > > > > > > > > http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/ > > > cfmx_perfo > > > rman > > > ce_brief.pdf > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > Rich Wild > > > Senior Web Developer > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > e-mango Tel: 01202 755 300 > > > Gild House Fax: 01202 755 301 > > > 74 Norwich Avenue West > > > Bournemouth Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > BH2 6AW, UK http://www.e-mango.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This message may contain information which is legally > > > privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended > > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorised > > > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information > > > is strictly prohibited. Such notification notwithstanding, > > > any comments, opinions, information or conclusions expressed > > > in this message are those of the originator, not of > > > e-mango.com ltd, unless otherwise explicitly and > > > independently indicated by an authorised representative of > > > e-mango.com ltd. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
