umm caller is just another scope... the following should work...

<cfscript>
"caller.#r_whereToNext#" = caller.=[#r_whereToNext#] &
varaibles.whereToNext;
</cfscript>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:34 PM
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] Looping over
form - syntax?


Since I'm learning stuff today, how can I do this without evaluate ?
<cfscript>
"caller.#r_whereToNext#" = evaluate("caller.#r_whereToNext#")&
varaibles.whereToNext;
</cfscript>


Russell


-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Brown
Sent: 12 August 2002 15:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] Looping over
form - syntax?


I was just curious, I'd never heard that evaluate was bad until today. I
need to look at some code and see if there is a better way of doing it than
using evaluate now

Russell

-----Original Message-----
From: Taz -=TT=- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August 2002 15:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] Looping over
form - syntax?


Go Russel

I want to see a fight between Freeserve and Ray Camden. I'll be taking bets
down the pub tonight!

Taz


> Don't see how Evaluate() can be avoided sometimes. I get the picture
though, where there is another way use it.


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to