caller[r_whereToNext] = caller[r_wheretoNext] & variables.whereToNext;

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 August 2002 15:35
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] 
> Looping over
> form - syntax?
> 
> 
> Since I'm learning stuff today, how can I do this without evaluate ?
> <cfscript>
> "caller.#r_whereToNext#" = 
> evaluate("caller.#r_whereToNext#")& varaibles.whereToNext;
> </cfscript>
> 
> 
> Russell
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Brown 
> Sent: 12 August 2002 15:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] 
> Looping over
> form - syntax?
> 
> 
> I was just curious, I'd never heard that evaluate was bad 
> until today. I need to look at some code and see if there is 
> a better way of doing it than using evaluate now
> 
> Russell
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taz -=TT=- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 August 2002 15:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] 
> Looping over
> form - syntax?
> 
> 
> Go Russel
> 
> I want to see a fight between Freeserve and Ray Camden. I'll 
> be taking bets
> down the pub tonight!
> 
> Taz
> 
> 
> > Don't see how Evaluate() can be avoided sometimes. I get the picture
> though, where there is another way use it.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to