Well Spike I know you like testing... Go and test this for me for a
couple of months and tell me how it turns out :-)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 13 August 2002 00:07
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] 
> Looping over fo rm - syntax?
> 
> 
> I think that depends on what you mean by safe.
> 
> If you mean safe in terms of not getting hacked then the 
> basic rule is the fewer processes you have running, the 
> better your chances are, but other than that it's pretty hard 
> to say quanititatively.
> 
> If you mean safe in terms of the apps from CF5 not 
> interfering with CFMX and vice versa then I don't think you 
> can really say for sure. I suppose it depends on the apps 
> themselves. If you have apps that talk to a lot of 3rd party 
> systems and do a lot of filesystem type access you could well 
> run into problems, but exactly what those problems would be 
> is anyone's guess.
> 
> Ultimately I think it depends on how critical the application 
> is, and how expensive it will be if anything goes wrong.
> 
> Why do you ask?
> 
> Spike
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Russ Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 13 August 2002 00:58
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] 
> > Looping over fo rm - syntax?
> > 
> > 
> > On a similar topic.
> > How safe do you reckon it would be to permanently run CFMx 
> (on its own
> > webserver) and CF5 together on a server.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: 12 August 2002 20:39
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ]
> > > Looping over fo rm - syntax?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I heard Jeremy allaire mentioning that it could be done, but that 
> > > you'd have to pay a CFMX license for each CD you distributed. I 
> > > think that was off the record though, so the official 
> word might be 
> > > different. It might be possible to distribute your apps using an 
> > > eval version of CFMX. Again, you'd need to check with 
> someone at MM 
> > > about that.
> > > 
> > > Spike
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Taz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: 12 August 2002 21:33
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ 
> cf-dev ] Looping 
> > > > over fo rm - syntax?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > You can do that with CFMX too.
> > > > 
> > > > I was thinking about that recently, since MX is java and
> > has its own
> > > > web server, it makes sense really. Question is.. has
> > anyone done it
> > > > yet? I really ought to pay more attention to
> > > Guru etc.
> > > > 
> > > > > Do you have any idea if you would have to pay a per CD
> > license for
> > > > BlueDragon?
> > > > 
> > > > No idea. You'd have to ask them.
> > > > 
> > > > Don't suppose anyone knows what MMs view on it is? (Lucas?)
> > > > Personally, I can't see it being a problem... possibly 
> > the opposite
> > > > since its just going to increase the use and awareness of the
> > > > ColdFusion language. The more well known it is the better. Plus 
> > > > people are always going to buy MM CFMX
> > > > for the bigger projects anyway, mainly because its 
> > > > Macromedia, but also because of the extra functionality 
> > > > (Verity, flash integration), also more developers will buy 
> > > > studio, MM certification, etc.
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe I'm just talking arse!
> > > > Taz
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to