Sure, You offering to donate a server to a worthy cause?
;-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 13 August 2002 01:20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] > Looping over fo rm - syntax? > > > Well Spike I know you like testing... Go and test this for me > for a couple of months and tell me how it turns out :-) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 13 August 2002 00:07 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] > > Looping over fo rm - syntax? > > > > > > I think that depends on what you mean by safe. > > > > If you mean safe in terms of not getting hacked then the > > basic rule is the fewer processes you have running, the > > better your chances are, but other than that it's pretty hard > > to say quanititatively. > > > > If you mean safe in terms of the apps from CF5 not > > interfering with CFMX and vice versa then I don't think you > > can really say for sure. I suppose it depends on the apps > > themselves. If you have apps that talk to a lot of 3rd party > > systems and do a lot of filesystem type access you could well > > run into problems, but exactly what those problems would be > > is anyone's guess. > > > > Ultimately I think it depends on how critical the application > > is, and how expensive it will be if anything goes wrong. > > > > Why do you ask? > > > > Spike > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Russ Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 13 August 2002 00:58 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] > > > Looping over fo rm - syntax? > > > > > > > > > On a similar topic. > > > How safe do you reckon it would be to permanently run CFMx > > (on its own > > > webserver) and CF5 together on a server. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 12 August 2002 20:39 > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ > cf-dev ] Looping > > > > over fo rm - syntax? > > > > > > > > > > > > I heard Jeremy allaire mentioning that it could be > done, but that > > > > you'd have to pay a CFMX license for each CD you distributed. I > > > > think that was off the record though, so the official > > word might be > > > > different. It might be possible to distribute your apps using an > > > > eval version of CFMX. Again, you'd need to check with > > someone at MM > > > > about that. > > > > > > > > Spike > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Taz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: 12 August 2002 21:33 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Evaluate is bad WAS RE: [ > > cf-dev ] Looping > > > > > over fo rm - syntax? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can do that with CFMX too. > > > > > > > > > > I was thinking about that recently, since MX is java and > > > has its own > > > > > web server, it makes sense really. Question is.. has > > > anyone done it > > > > > yet? I really ought to pay more attention to > > > > Guru etc. > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any idea if you would have to pay a per CD > > > license for > > > > > BlueDragon? > > > > > > > > > > No idea. You'd have to ask them. > > > > > > > > > > Don't suppose anyone knows what MMs view on it is? (Lucas?) > > > > > Personally, I can't see it being a problem... possibly > > > the opposite > > > > > since its just going to increase the use and awareness of the > > > > > ColdFusion language. The more well known it is the > better. Plus > > > > > people are always going to buy MM CFMX for the bigger > projects > > > > > anyway, mainly because its Macromedia, but also > because of the > > > > > extra functionality (Verity, flash integration), also more > > > > > developers will buy studio, MM certification, etc. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe I'm just talking arse! > > > > > Taz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
