It does that, although it leaves them in their native scope as well. The reason is that prior to CFMX, in order to call a Fusebox application recursively, you had to use <cfmodule>. But that meant that all the vars passed to the <cfmodule> were in the attributes scope. So, instead of having every bit of code littered with conditionals, we copied all form and URL vars into the attributes scope so that the code works identically whether FB is called normally or through a <cfmodule> call. I think that will all go away once we get CFMX sorted out.
It's funny: some people don't like that feature of FB at all. Ralph Fiol, a friend of mine and creator of CFObjects, said that was the *only* thing he liked about FB! See? You really can't please everyone. -----Original Message----- From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Fusebox - a question regarding v3 I haven't looked at FuseBox for a while (before V3). However, one of the things I found "odd" about fusebox, was the use of the "FormURL2Attributes" tag. It seems odd to me to remove variables from their "native scope" and copy them into the variable scope. Is this still the case? ~J > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 4:16 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Fusebox > > > sorry, didn't mean to imply that you thought it was bad, I was > actually asking a kosher question! ;) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 15 August 2002 16:27 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Fusebox > > > > > > I did mean fusebox was good or bad. What ever works for you... > > > > Justin > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 4:11 PM > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Fusebox > > > > > > > > > I've never used fusebox. Or looked at it for that matter. > > > > > > Does this make me bad? > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 15 August 2002 16:22 > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Fusebox > > > > > > > > > > > > To save time, I've set up a rule for mails with a subject > > containing > > > > "fusebox". > > > > > > > > Apply when mail arrives with subject "fusebox" > > > > insert random flame, > > > > slag list members, > > > > reply to sender. > > > > > > > > > > > > :-) ~J > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
