The difference between doing it locally vs across the network is pretty negligible.
For the template with 100 calls the numbers were in the 1.6-1.8 seconds region. Spike > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 06 September 2002 16:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Performance of Remote objects - was > RE: [ cf-dev ] .cfm enryption > > > No I hadn't, but I just did :-) > > > Initial results from locally invoked component never > idicated anything > > other than 0ms for the page to render. > > > When the component was invoked as a webservice from another > computer > > on the same LAN the numbers were from 40-50ms. > > It's not exactly what I had in mind, as I was thinking of the > difference between calling a local cfc, as a service and as a > component. The 40-50ms might be due to the network speed > rather than the cfc response time.. > > So > <cfinvoke method = "method name" > vs > <cfinvoke webservice = "URLtoWSDL_location" > > regards > Justin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Douglas Humphris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 06 September 2002 14:57 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Performance of Remote objects - was RE: [ > > cf-dev ] .cfm enryption > > > > > > > Has anyone done any comparisons of calling a cfc locally v > > calling a cfc as > > > a web service? > > > > > Justin > > > > > > Have you read Spike's earlier email regarding this? > > D > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
