...sigh...
There are many ways to check a valid URL. Most people's validation is just
too simple and allows very simple URL's that are blatantly invalid. For
example, the previous regex:
> REFindNoCase("^[a-z]+://[a-z0-9:@&=;?%$.+!*'(),-]+(/[a-z0-9:@&
> =;?##%$_.+!*'(),-]*)*$", attributes.url)>
would have allowed (watch wrapping)
"abcsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdf://:::::===@@@@@@@@......+++/@&@&@&@&@&+====;/''
'-.,"
Which to me looks invalid.
Do a search of the archives for: "Regular Expression for Email and Domain
Checking"
If you want you can update and alter the regex in the isValidEmail function
I have created for emails (it has to validate a domain too [see archive
above for some in-depth explanation], see if you can go from there):
http://www.pjnetsolutions.com/regex/isValidEmail.func
Have fun!
Paul
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
