true, but i'm seeing sites where at least 75% of SE traffic is Google or
Google affiliates.  As long as you're sorted for Google, you should do ok.
I suspect this might be truer for smaller or new sites.  Large sites start
to get a lot of incoming links from all kinds of other sources that can
account for plenty of traffic.  IMHO.


Duncan Cumming
IT Manager

http://www.alienationdesign.co.uk
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0141 575 9700
Fax: 0141 575 9600

Creative solutions in a technical world

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your domain names online from:
http://www.alienationdomains.co.uk
Reseller options available!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                                       
                            
                    Rich Wild                                                          
                            
                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:     "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>     
                    go.com>              cc:                                           
                            
                                         Subject:     RE: [ cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe 
URLS                        
                    02/10/2003                                                         
                            
                    12:02                                                              
                            
                    Please                                                             
                            
                    respond to                                                         
                            
                    dev                                                                
                            
                                                                                       
                            
                                                                                       
                            



cool, but the point still stands that a lot of traffic from Search engines
does not come from Google.

It would be a mistake to not optimise your site for those, as it would be a
mistake to only optimise your site for MS explorer 6 - both ways, you're
missing out on potential traffic.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 October 2003 11:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe URLS
>
>
>
> yeah, i know what you meant, but i was trying to make the
> point that Google's the only one that's really counted for
> quite a long while.  expect it to remain so, as i've not yet
> seen anything to challenge it.  some are technically
> equivalent, but simply don't have the massive userbase that
> Google has got.  unless they really mess things up, or MSN
> come up with an amazing search (possible) they aren't likely
> to lose that.
>
>
> Duncan Cumming
> IT Manager
>
> http://www.alienationdesign.co.uk
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel: 0141 575 9700
> Fax: 0141 575 9600
>
> Creative solutions in a technical world
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get your domain names online from: http://www.alienationdomains.co.uk
> Reseller options available!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>                     Rich Wild
>
>                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                     go.com>              cc:
>
>                                          Subject:     RE: [
> cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe URLS
>                     02/10/2003
>
>                     11:54
>
>                     Please
>
>                     respond to
>
>                     dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> no silly, how long will google be on top for?
>
> It's a mistake to forget the other Ses.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 02 October 2003 11:52
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe URLS
> >
> >
> >
> > 5 years and counting
> >
> >
> > Duncan Cumming
> > IT Manager
> >
> > http://www.alienationdesign.co.uk
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Tel: 0141 575 9700
> > Fax: 0141 575 9600
> >
> > Creative solutions in a technical world
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Get your domain names online from:
> http://www.alienationdomains.co.uk
> > Reseller options available!
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                     Rich Wild
> >
> >                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
> > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >                     go.com>              cc:
> >
> >                                          Subject:     RE: [
> > cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe URLS
> >                     02/10/2003
> >
> >                     11:50
> >
> >                     Please
> >
> >                     respond to
> >
> >                     dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > And google really is the only one that counts now
> >
> > but for how long?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 02 October 2003 11:48
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe URLS
> > >
> > >
> > > And google really is the only one that counts now
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 02 October 2003 11:45
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe URLS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > he might be using the technique well, but the site isn't even
> > > > indexed on Google.  is the purpose of doing this to
> > improve search
> > > > engine listing, or just to make your URL look cool? Maybe
> > he's just
> > > > launched it or something and hasn't got round to actually
> > submitting
> > > > it to the engines?
> > > >
> > > > Personally I've never felt the need to bother with it, as
> > Google can
> > > > index your site with URL parameters anyway.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Duncan Cumming
> > > > IT Manager
> > > >
> > > > http://www.alienationdesign.co.uk
> > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Tel: 0141 575 9700
> > > > Fax: 0141 575 9600
> > > >
> > > > Creative solutions in a technical world
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Get your domain names online from:
> > > http://www.alienationdomains.co.uk
> > > > Reseller options available!
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >                     "Stephen Pope"
> > > >
> > > >                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >                     rv.org.uk>                 cc:
> > > >
> > > >                                                Subject:
> > > > RE: [ cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe URLS
> > > >                     02/10/2003 11:39
> > > >
> > > >                     Please respond to
> > > >
> > > >                     dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sure thing .. a friend of mine has written a site called
> > > > www.urbangearguide.com which uses this technique very
> > well. Im just
> > > > waiting to hear from him on how he did it .. but I'm sure
> > its just
> > > > using apache .. I heard this is much easier to do in
> > Apache 2 but we
> > > > all still run 1.3 as standard so my quest continues !
> > > >
> > > > Anything I find I'll let everyone know !
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Stephen
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Aidan Whitehall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 02 October 2003 11:34
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] SearchEngine Safe URLS
> > > >
> > > > > Yup .. I was gonna use mod_rewrite .. but I was asking if
> > > > anyone had
> > > > > any tutorials on using mod_rewrite to accomplish this task :�)
> > > >
> > > > Stephen, if you find anything half-way decent on
> mod_rewrite, can
> > > > you post the URL? I was looking for the same thing over a
> > month ago
> > > > and didn't find anything other than what's in the Apache docs.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Aidan Whitehall <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Macromedia ColdFusion Developer
> > > > Fairbanks Environmental Ltd  +44 (0)1695 51775
> > > > Queen's Awards Winner 2003
> <http://www.fairbanks.co.uk/go/awards>
> > > >
> > > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > > __________
> > > > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star
> > Internet. The
> > > > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a
> > > > proactive anti-virus service working around the clock,
> around the
> > > > globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk
> > > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > > __________
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ** Archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%> 40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> > > >
> > >
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ** Archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%> 40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> > > >
> > >
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ** Archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%> 40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> > > >
> > >
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ** Archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%> 40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> > >
> >
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%> 40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%> 40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to