I like overkill :) It forces you to think in a specific way and gives you an event driven model that lends itself well to the design process.
Coming from a background in developing Xwindows, OpenRoad and VB, I find this useful. The concepts that it provides allows for development of complex business processes and encourages re-useability and a very object orientated thought process. It is also easier to describe to end clients (through the use of mindmaps etc), and allows modelling in UML or any design methodology you may use. You can also hand the damm code on to other people and know they should understand it. Again it isn't everybody's cup of tea, but I rarely do simple, couple of page sites. I'm also able to use reuse everything from one site in another site, by just changing the layout templates. Adam > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Fennell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 October 2003 11:24 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > > > It does have some good ideas > But boy is it over kill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 October 2003 11:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > > I'm curious just how many people on this list use fusebox ? > > Personally I hate the thing, I like the ideas involved and but I prefer > to adapt the methodology to my own code in my own way. I'm not having a > go at fusebox coders (although I do kinda think Mach II is a bit > hilarious) I just think that I have found some people and companies that > hate Coldfusion just for the fact that they have only used /see it in > relation to Fusebox ! Just wondered how much people on this list used it > and if they have always done fusebox or moved to it after learning CF > initially. > > Just being curious I guess hehe :�) > > /me awaits the flames > > Stephen > > -----Original Message----- > From: Damian Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 October 2003 10:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > > aaaaaarrrgggg my brain's fused > > I thought fusebox was meant to be simple ;0) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:48 AM > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > > > > I've actually found that globals is not that good an idea as it makes > > maintenance a pain. > > > > If you do require includes from another fuse, then work the path out > and > > include (../security/queries/qry_member_details_select.cfm) > > > > BUT > > > > There is no hard and fast rule. > > > > What I would say is that if your fuse requires functions from another > fuse, > > then you should maybe consider them to be sub fuses and not seperate > > independent fuses. > > > > The other option is to copy the files into the fuse. At least you'll > know > > the code will work exactly as planned within that fuse and any changes > to > > the other fuse will not impact other fuses. > > > > Adam > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ellwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 24 October 2003 10:25 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > > > > > > > > > True, I hadn't thought of that. If I wish to drag my circuit to > another > > > application then it will fail because of the globals being missing. > > > > > > This is why I asked the question in the first place. Thanks for your > > > valuable input I will rethink my strategy. Although I am > > > currently wondering > > > if there will ever be a perfect solution or just a best compromise. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Ellis > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 16/10/2003 > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 16/10/2003 > > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
