And I wouldn't disagree. However, choose what's best and don't take for granted someone else's method. You can benefit from their method but their method can often benefit from your amendments.
Paolo > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 October 2003 15:42 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > > > Erm, > And there I was thinking it had more to do with the fact that other > developers using fusebox would be able to contribute to your > development > process and would be working with a similar mindset. > > Why do you think application developers sometimes request > that somebody > develops using UML. It's all about working with the same mindset. > > Adam > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paolo Piponi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 24 October 2003 15:33 > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > > > > > > Fusebox evangelists are control freaks who just like the sound of > > their own > > voice. Take what you want from the fusebox method and ditch > what looks > > stupid (it probably is). Just make sure you do something > > methodical and make > > some sort of documentation of the structure. > > > > Paolo > > > > -- > > ** Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
