I think when business decides on 'one method is best' then this will happen.

Each business has a unique approach to its processes and managers, by their
very nature, like to 'improve' proceses.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Damian Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 October 2003 13:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] where to now WAS MVC/Methodologies WAS RE: [
> cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list?
>
>
> On a more serious note, whatever the preferences it does seem
> that everyone
> is agreed with the fact that methodologies are a good idea. I'm interested
> to know what's likely to happen in the future- this kind of
> conversation is
> really a demonstration of how internet applications are beginning
> to be seen
> on a par with all application development. Gone are the days of
> web monkeys
> and cowboys (well... *takes off wide brim hat and tasselled jacket*).
>
> But what happens next?? We're so used to a rapid speed of technological
> development, when and how is it going to slow donwn. Is it now? we're
> talking about methodologies, isn't this like when people got
> together in the
> industrial revolution and said... "hey why don't we make our
> screws the same
> sizes?" and others said "screw you"
>
> Open question...
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Damian Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] MVC/Methodologies WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] Any
> fusecoders
> on the list?
>
>
> > > PS Fusebox people smell like tramps wee.. dammit its started!
> >
> > Well that's what happens if you stay in a box all day, you
> start smelling.
> > Ask David Blaine.
> >
> > *duck*
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stephen Pope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:55 PM
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] MVC/Methodologies WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] Any
> fusecoders
> > on the list?
> >
> >
> > I think the good thing is that it shows all the levels of the
> methodology
> > and how you can implement its in a simple or complex form
> depending on the
> > scale of the project .. and you can say 'hey I wanna get off now' at any
> > point during the process and you would still have something
> workable ! :�)
> >
> > I find it very interesting to hear these views on something that has
> shaped
> > the CF community in such a fashion. I agree its got a bit religious now
> > (hold back the fanatics with burning torches etc etc) but sill very
> > interesting on how these CF 'factions' exist side to side and the whole
> > thing hasn't descended into violently opposing name-calling groups like
> some
> > languages, ok there are tensions but hey we CF lot area pretty friendly
> > bunch.
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > PS Fusebox people smell like tramps wee.. dammit its started!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ellwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 24 October 2003 12:35
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] MVC/Methodologies WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] Any
> fusecoders
> > on the list?
> >
> > Yeah, I saw this demo/presentation at CF_Europe. Unfortunately Benoit
> > English managed to confuse the difficult subject he was trying
> to explain.
> > The breeze slides are a little easier to understand without his lecture
> but
> > I would love to talk to the guy on a one to one because I am
> sure he would
> > totally confuse me with the technicalities of MVC.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 24 October 2003 12:23
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://www.benorama.com/coldfusion/index.htm
> >
> > I think this is a great website for doing MVC in CF .. I certainly
> > learned a lot from this site in applying this methodology to CF. (I know
> > its been posted here before but I keep going back to this one !)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 24 October 2003 12:18
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [ cf-dev ] MVC/Methodologies WAS RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders
> > on the list?
> >
> > > Does anyone use MVC? And if so, how does this differ from
> > > fusebox because the way I see it M = Model = Query, V = View
> > > = display, C = Controller = Fusebox/Actions.
> >
> > I have got massively into looking at different methodologies mainly
> > because
> > I have some of the changes in the FB community and other places (ie Mach
> > II
> > and the creation of CFCs).
> >
> > MVC is only one design pattern, albeit a useful one.  Mach II is an
> > implementation of that design pattern, and therefore is a methodology.
> > There are many other design patterns (and you'll find reference to the
> > Gang
> > of Four and others when googling for design patterns).  What I have
> > discovered is that actually, MVC isn't all that simple to do with CF
> > (Mach
> > II isn't simple)!  Because it is an object-oriented methodology. MVC is
> > useful in the separation of data from actual display, which is useful
> > when
> > you have 2 separate ways of accessing the site (ie flash and  HTML).
> >
> > My personal opinion is that CFMX allows a certain degree of Object
> > Oriented-ness to be allowed in programming websites.  The usefulness of
> > this
> > is very much down to how good a person is at coding in an object
> > oriented
> > nature and most CF programmers are frankly not very good at this!  Again
> > it
> > comes down to usign the right tools for the right jobs.  Learning how to
> > build a website properly is more down to good design and structure than
> > actual coding and what methodologies are used.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to