i must admit that it is a prudent standpoint to not trust any product till
at last some water has gone under the bridge...

but i am interested to hear why you say that this is a problem with
ColdFusion MX?
water has passed under the bridge.

L.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:59 AM
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] New servers , use 2003 or 2000


> I don't suspect you will have any issues per say.....I just don't trust MM
> products from a security standpoint as first editions........
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 October 2003 10:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] New servers , use 2003 or 2000
>
> Well,
> As of Red Sky Macromedia caters for 2003.
>
> I'm also looking at the box as an excercise in skill development, having
had
> a unix box before hand.
>
> Unfortunately I am sooo snowed under with work, that getting anywhere near
> the box and messing around has been almost impossible.
>
> I honestly haven't had any issues with my one lonely box.
>
> Adam
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 31 October 2003 10:35
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] New servers , use 2003 or 2000
> >
> >
> > LOL :-) the Grolsch (?) advert  where everythings "not ready yet"!
> >
> > We are a 99.9% Microsoft house and we are rolling out Windows
> > 2003 / Windows
> > XP (and beyond) across our global network - something like 37,000
> > machines......  We did not go for Windows 2003 as, we know that with
> > all Microsoft products its got at least 2-3 Service Packs awaiting it
> > - with one
> > already in the making.  Obviously our case is extreme as we have so
> > many nodes to cater for etc...
> >
> > Macromedia did not support 2003 out of the box as far as I know....and
> > in that instance, Neo was never really tested against it - so it's a
> > case of why upgrade when I know its been tested on 2K...
> >
> > If I need to upgrade when SP1 comes out.....then all the better ;-)
> >
> > Besides.....if you are not likely to use any of the Windows 2003
> > features other then IIS then why bother?
> >
> > Just because its new doesn't mean its better.....think of how many
> > people still use NT!!
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 31 October 2003 10:12
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] New servers , use 2003 or 2000
> >
> > I know this is being pedantic, but which advertisement?
> >
> > I had to make a decision on this a couple of months ago, and decided
> > that
> > win2003 was a better future proof option.
> >
> > I have had no issues with the machine. Quite solid really.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 31 October 2003 09:28
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] New servers , use 2003 or 2000
> > >
> > >
> > > I really do disagree.. As the advertisement states...."it's not ready
> > > yet".....   Seriously give it at least one service packs...to go
> > > for it due
> > > to the lock down features (which can be actioned manually in
> > > 2000) is not a
> > > reason to upgrade.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adam Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 30 October 2003 23:35
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] New servers , use 2003 or 2000
> > >
> > > Go with 2003.
> > >
> > > Starts off all locked down and you open up the services you need.
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 30 October 2003 14:49
> > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] New servers , use 2003 or 2000
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Personally I would stick with Windows 2000 as Windows 2003 is
> > > > still a tad flakey with CF....too many workarounds....give it at
> > > > least one more Service Pack methinks......and for Native 2003
> > > > support out of the box regarding MM.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 30 October 2003 14:53
> > > > To: Cfuk
> > > > Subject: [ cf-dev ] New servers , use 2003 or 2000
> > > >
> > > > I haven't used Win 2003 yet, is it ready for prime time, with
> > > > CFMX6.1 or should we install win 2000 on a new server?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Justin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ** Archive:
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ** Archive:
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ** Archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > --
> > > ** Archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
human
> help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -- 
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to