tis a good point... it is more of a problem when you're viewing the source through the browser. At the developing end I'm doing everything modular anyway so it's in manageable chunks. And 3 nested tables aren't necessarily the easiest things to read, especially if they got colspans and rowspans all over the place... it mostly depends on how well the code is written surely?
...I'm playing devil's advocate really as like Paul, I'm only starting to look at using div layouts properly =8^P ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Moretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:35 PM Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] <div> vs. <table> > > > Stephen Moretti wrote: > >> can use them accessibly (even with IE5 on a mac) and I think that's > >> what we > >> should be aiming to do as developers -- moving content away from > >> structure. > >> Isn't that what development frameworks are all about? > >> > > > > Ummm... I think that this is probably one of the major major drawbacks > > to DIVs and CSS. You are moving away from structure. Creating sites > > with DIVs (no matter what the benefits are) makes sites with source code > > that has no structure and is almost impossible to read. :o( > > > > So no comment on the readability of DIV/CSS layout code?? > > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
