I tend to specify Ids for div tags that are used for layouts - then you can
use the id to create specific classes for the items in the div - if you see
what I mean... I don't think readability is an issue whatsoever, unless the
person writing the layout doesn't know what they are doing... just my 2p.
it's great to have the ability to have the navigation as the top div, and
the content in a lower div, so:
<div id="nav"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
rather than something like:
<table>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>
What's more readable?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jolly Green Giant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] <div> vs. <table>
> I really disagree with this. I usually specify a class for my divs which
> would tell me the structure. Much easier to read one div tag than all the
> table tags necessary to do the same.
>
> >>Ummm... I think that this is probably one of the major major drawbacks
to
> >>DIVs and CSS. You are moving away from structure. Creating sites with
> >>DIVs (no matter what the benefits are) makes sites with source code that
> >>has no structure and is almost impossible to read. :o(
>
>
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
