Harshad,
I don't want to be misunderstood, I didn't started alternative packaging
project, I am contributing to Juniper/contrail-packages that was
probably started as an alternative to contrail-packaging (which I call
official packaging here) long time ago.
Contributing to Juniper/contrail-packages and filling bugs to
Juniper/contrail-packaging doesn't make much sense.
Filip
On 07/15/2015 10:40 PM, Harshad Nakil wrote:
Filip,
I don’t mind people building their own packaging scripts and more the
merrier.
However, if you see issues if official distribution, you could at
least do the community service of filing bugs for the same. It will
help us if you identify specific issues rather than asking to junk
everything.
Regards
-Harshad
On Jul 15, 2015, at 1:17 PM, Filip Pytloun <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
we decided not to use official distribution from contrail-packaging,
because unfortunately it doesn't meet expected quality standards on
packaging
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
