Hi Ato,

I downloaded official 3.0.2 and it behaves same with VXLAN User Configured. 
When I switched to Automatic, it starts to send appropriate VNI as Ethernet tag 
id, but MPLS label is still 0.  Should we see VNI tag under MPLS label in 
Wireshark?

Can you send us your capture?

Thanks

Jakub

Odesláno z iPadu

2. 8. 2016 v 0:49, Antonio Sanchez-Monge <[email protected]>:

> Hi Jakub,
>  
> First let me clarify one thing.
>  
> I had written: “In that case I think MPLS label 0 is normal but Ethernet Tag 
> should be different from zero, and it is zero.”
>  
> This is wrong. MPLS label 0 is not normal. I checked with our expert and also 
> did some tests. In all my tests with 3.0.2, both Ethernet tag and MPLS label 
> are set to the same non-zero value. This is true both for floating IP and for 
> non-floating. So what you are seeing in the tcpdump (MPLS label 0, Ethernet 
> tag 0...) doesn’t look normal. There may be something specific to your setup.
>  
> Would you try to create it from scratch? Please check the route in the 
> control node introspect (TCP port 8083) and see in the bgp.evpn.0 table what 
> label value the route has.
>  
> Cheers,
> Ato
>  
> From: Antonio Sanchez-Monge <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, 1 August 2016 at 23:38
> To: Jakub Pavlik <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marek Čeloud <[email protected]>, Lichner Ivan 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail EVPN VXLAN on Cisco ASR9006
>  
> Might be specific of floating IP pool, will have a look tomorrow.
>  
> From: Jakub Pavlik <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, 1 August 2016 at 23:28
> To: Antonio Sanchez-Monge <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marek Čeloud <[email protected]>, Lichner Ivan 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail EVPN VXLAN on Cisco ASR9006
>  
> Antonio,
> 
> yes, we have VXLAN encapsulation priority and Indetifier Mode is User 
> Configured.
> 
> It is floating ip pool with VNI 64512 and Route Target 64512:64512
> 
> Jakub
> 
> On 1.8.2016 23:25, Antonio Sanchez-Monge wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>  
> I guess under “Configure > Infrastructure > Global Config > Forwarding 
> Options > Encapsulation Priority Order” you have VXLAN on top, right? In that 
> case I think MPLS label 0 is normal but Ethernet Tag should be different from 
> zero, and it is zero.
>  
> What is VxLAN Identifier Mode set to?
>  
> How is the VN configured? What VNI does it have?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ato
>  
> From: Jakub Pavlik <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, 1 August 2016 at 23:09
> To: Antonio Sanchez-Monge <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marek Čeloud <[email protected]>, Lichner Ivan 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail EVPN VXLAN on Cisco ASR9006
>  
> Hi Antonio,
> 
> thanks for quick reply! I will try to do change type.
> 
> It is Contrail 3.0.2 (3 weeks old build).
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> Jakub
> 
>  
> On 1.8.2016 23:06, Antonio Sanchez-Monge wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>  
> Cisco is sending Type 5 (IP Prefix) EVPN routes that we don’t support. Do you 
> know if there is any way to configure IOS XR so it does generate IP/MAC (Type 
> 2) EVPN routes instead?
>  
> As for the MPLS Label Stack set to 0 by Contrail, what version are you 
> running?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ato
>  
>  
> From: Dev <[email protected]> on behalf of Jakub Pavlik 
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, 1 August 2016 at 22:44
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marek Čeloud <[email protected]>, Lichner Ivan 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail EVPN VXLAN on Cisco ASR9006
>  
> There is also log from Cisco box:
> 
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Aug  2 20:36:49.681 : bgp[1058]: [default-rtr]: UPDATE from 
> 10.171.20.72 contains nh 10.171.20.30/32, gw_afi 0, flags 0x0, nlri_afi 14
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Aug  2 20:36:49.681 : bgp[1058]: [default-rtr]: 
> NH-Validate-Create: addr=10.171.20.30/32, len=4, nlriafi=14, 
> nbr=10.171.20.72, gwafi=0,
>  gwlen=4, gwaddrlen=32::: nhout=0x10a52970, validity=1, 
> attrwdrflags=0x00000000
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Aug  2 20:36:49.681 : bgp[1058]: [default-rtr]: 
> --bgp4_rcv_attributes--: END: nbr=10.171.20.72:: msg=0x10043cc0/138, 
> updlen=119, attrbl
> =0x10043cd7/115, ipv4reachlen=0, msginpath=0x3df0ba0, asloopcheck=1, 
> attrwdrfl=0x00000000:: samecluster=0, local_as_prepended=0, attr_wdr_flags 
> 0x0000
> 0000, myascount=0:: rcvdata=0x10043d4a/0, errptr=0x10043d16/52
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Aug  2 20:36:49.681 : bgp[1058]: [default-rtr] (l2evpn): 
> Received UPDATE from 10.171.20.72 with attributes: 
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Aug  2 20:36:49.681 : bgp[1058]: [default-rtr] (l2evpn): 
> nexthop 10.171.20.30/32, origin ?, localpref 200, metric 100, originator 10.17
> 1.20.30, extended community Encapsulation Type:8 
> 0x8071:0xfc:0x00:0x00:0x00:0x00:0x04 RT:64512:64512 RT:64512:8000004 
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Aug  2 20:36:49.681 : bgp[1058]: [default-rtr] (l2evpn): 
> Received prefix v4Addr:10.171.20.30:2:[2][0][48][02b2.de4a.7e30][32][10.167.0.
> 4]/136 (path ID: none) with MPLS label 0 from neighbor 10.171.20.72
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Aug  2 20:36:49.681 : bgp[1058]: [default-rtr] (l2evpn): 
> Prefix v4Addr:10.171.20.30:2:[2][0][48][02b2.de4a.7e30][32][10.167.0.4]/136 (p
> ath ID: none) received from 10.171.20.72 DENIED RT extended community is not 
> imported locally
> 
> On 1.8.2016 22:39, Jakub Pavlik wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> does anybody tested Contrail 3.X with Cisco ASR9006 IOS XR Software, Version 
> 5.3.3 with EVPN VxLAN?
> 
> We are trying to run EVPN. BGP peering is established, but there is mismatch 
> in BGP update messages. We are getting this from contrail controller:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2016-08-01 Mon 16:45:35:074.937 CEST  ntw01 [Thread 140320977651456, Pid 
> 8325]: BGP [SYS_WARN]: BgpPeerMessageLog: BGP Peer default-domain:default-pro
> ject:ip-fabric:__default__:ntw01:default-domain:default-project:ip-fabric:__default__:ASR9006-1
>  RECV MP NLRI parse error for e-vpn route controller/sr
> c/bgp/bgp_peer.cc 1178
> 
> 
> I attached also captured tcpdump files with update messages from contrail to 
> cisco (contrail) and from cisco to contrail (cisco). 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jakub
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jakub Pavlik
> CTO
>  
> [tcp ◕ cloud]
>  
> +420 602 177 027
> [email protected]
>  
> tcp cloud a.s.
> Thamova 16
> 186 00 Praha 8 - Karlin
> Czech republic
> http://tcpcloud.eu
> http://opentcpcloud.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jakub Pavlik
> CTO
>  
> [tcp ◕ cloud]
>  
> +420 602 177 027
> [email protected]
>  
> tcp cloud a.s.
> Thamova 16
> 186 00 Praha 8 - Karlin
> Czech republic
> http://tcpcloud.eu
> http://opentcpcloud.org
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jakub Pavlik
> CTO
>  
> [tcp ◕ cloud]
>  
> +420 602 177 027
> [email protected]
>  
> tcp cloud a.s.
> Thamova 16
> 186 00 Praha 8 - Karlin
> Czech republic
> http://tcpcloud.eu
> http://opentcpcloud.org
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

Reply via email to