Hi Greg,
On 21.09.2017 22:59, Gregory Elkinbard wrote:
Lukasz,
Couple of notes.
1. Nobody is ripping out analytics. If the community considers them
important the project can continue under community leadership. Lets
talk to Mirantis or ENEA, maybe they will be willing to contribute
some resources to get this going.
Sure. But this way we end up with two analytics (and web uis) - a
community-led one and an Appformix-based one. My [initial] point was
that OpenContrail core must be able to talk to both, so introducing an
extra piece of the puzzle doesn't result in any conflicts. And it also
should be an added value, not an implicit requirement. Say, you have it,
you get smarter SI scheduling. You don't (that is, you have a community
version only), you get a simple random scheduler, but you can still run
an SI with it.
According to what's posted it looks like this is the case, but
personally I'd still like to look at the blueprints as discussion is a
bit too general now.
Thanks,
Valentine
2. OpenContrail just like Linux kernel is not a product it is a
community code base. Distro manufacturers create a product from that
base code which they sell. Or you can create your own distro based
on open source which you maintain. Which is what some openstack and
opencontrail customers do. As a commercial site operator you are
likely to use commercially supported products in your environment.
Which will still be available from Mirantis and Juniper. So, I do
not see a significant market impact. And if you are DIY type, then
some contribution from you in terms of bug fixes and maybe
maintenance of a module, like analytics is expected.
Thanks
Greg
*From: *Dev <dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org> on behalf of Łukasz
Łukasiewicz <lukasz.lukasiew...@codilime.com>
*Date: *Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 12:27 PM
*To: *Harshad Nakil <hna...@gmail.com>
*Cc: *"krzysztof.klimo...@codilime.com"
<krzysztof.klimo...@codilime.com>, "dev@lists.opencontrail.org"
<dev@lists.opencontrail.org>
*Subject: *Re: [opencontrail-dev] [TSC] Analytics and web ui on OC 5.0
and beyond
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Harshad Nakil <hna...@gmail.com
<mailto:hna...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I don’t agree with your assertion that contrail is viable product
without contrail analytics shutdown (operational status)
I am not sure if I verbalized properly what I meant - as a network
operator, when looking for moving my datacenter to SDN solution, I am
not going to consider OpenContrail as viable product on the market if
analytics is gone.
and other services in contrail should not use analytics API
(operational status).
Can you please tell a little bit more? I, personally, find situation,
where cluster status is reflected by multiple sources of truth, a little
bit confusing. Perhaps I am missing something.
Lukas
*Error! Filename not specified.*
-------------------------------
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged, it may contain information that is confidential in CodiLime
Sp. z o. o. It is intended solely for the addressee. Any access to this
email by third parties is unauthorized. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
action undertaken or neglected in reliance thereon is prohibited and may
result in your liability for damages.
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
