On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> wrote: > Well good thing that you are actually not an operator then :)
I am happy about that too ;) > [rest of the words] I agree - with a couple "buts": - IMO it would require a new standard for existing and new solutions to follow. - You need a component providing (and gathering) health/metrics of multiple SDN solutions available on the market. Depending on the existence and adoption level of aforementioned standard, it can be quick and easy or not. I don't know if this would be the goal for contrail-analytics, but the idea is very tempting - especially in the form of a separate project. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Gregory Elkinbard <gelkinb...@juniper.net> wrote: > Nobody is ripping out analytics. If the community considers them important > the project can continue under community leadership. Yes, Greg, I know. I was simply expanding small part of my previous e-mail to avoid confusion. Seems like I've managed to generate more. Good job, myself. ;) On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Valentine Sinitsyn <valentine.sinit...@gmail.com> wrote: > According to what's posted it looks like this is the case, but personally I'd > still like to look at the blueprints as discussion is a bit too general now. Agreed. Let's wait for the blueprints. Lukas -- ------------------------------- The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged, it may contain information that is confidential in CodiLime Sp. z o. o. It is intended solely for the addressee. Any access to this email by third parties is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action undertaken or neglected in reliance thereon is prohibited and may result in your liability for damages. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.opencontrail.org http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
