At Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:19:53 +0100, Michał Masłowski wrote: > > as well as building good relationships > > with other Free Software organisations, FSDG adhering Projects and > > upstream (Uploading Parabola Packages to AUR, reporting bugs to arch > > etc). > > +1 > > > and spend the rests for stable infrastructure > > (buying VPS / Domain Names/ etc) that will reduce the frequent > > downtime. > > And the wildcard TLS certificate?
I'd be up for having a pool of funds that doesn't go to developers, but can be used for project expenses. > > I have also seen issues like unstable source code management which > > needs fixing. Every major distribution has its own source code > > management system and Arch has "ABS" which is broken in > > Parabola. Packages from abslibre mostly don't get merged and the user > > has to rely on using GIT. GIT works in most cases however "using git > > for abslibre" and "using abs for packages from Arch" seems like a > > dirty hack to me rather than a long term solution. We need an unified > > solution to this. > > I think it's much more deeply broken: ABS is not synchronized with > binary packages, so we can get binaries at one sync and ABS hours/day > later. Preach it! See-also: db-import, a (beta) solution that attempts to address this. > I believe we should get from Arch only sources and build our own > binaries, so we have verified availability of sources and can do > important improvements like debug symbol packages that GNUtoo > suggested. (This needs much work and a build server.) I'm open to that. > > 3) The issues must not stay as a mere discussion / suggestion but also > > be implemented in a timely manner. > > +1 _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
