On 05/12/14 20:10, coadde wrote: > > > André Silva wrote: > > On 12/05/2014 04:32 PM, Micha? Mas?owski wrote: > >>> this would be a problem, to me, if the donations don't come > >>> from the community, who ideally would pay to develop features > >>> useful for everyone, but from a company, who ultimately pays to > >>> develop features that are commercially useful to them. > > >> This highly reminds me of [0]. > > >> [0] > >> http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2014/12/03/conservancy-supporter.html > > >>> i think this list is a self-organized commitee and should stay > >>> that way, no need for bureaucratic management. > > >> +1; self-organized committee of both developers and users. > >> (While scheduled IRC meetings might be useful.) > > >>> * accepting funding and donations would require to form a > >>> non-profit organization? > >>> > >>> * if so where would it be located? we're all over the world > >>> > >>> * will be accept which currency/ies? or only cryptocoins?[0] > >>> > >>> * will be have a bank account? > > >> Or get a fiscal sponsor, leaving the same questions. > > >>> * or, will parabola hackers accept personal donations? if so, > >>> how will be keep track of how much everyone is receiving and if > >>> the return in development is fair? > > >> There is at least one person who says they would donate only if > >> there was a Parabola Project that shared the money between > >> developers in a fair way. > > >>> my fault, i'll fix it when you pay me!! >:) > >>> > >>> ? my third issue with donations... > > >> +1 > > > +1 how mtjm analysed everything, perfect! > > +1
+1 > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev -- Un saúdo, Jorge López
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
