-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 01/30/2015 11:06 AM, André Silva wrote: > On 01/30/2015 03:06 AM, hellekin wrote: >> Duh... I had a compiled version in /usr/local... A splendid >> illustration of why one should not multitask: you forget about >> what you're doing. > >> So, as I discovered that Gajim 0.16 did not let me in any >> conference room, I removed the package and try to compile it in >> order to figure out why that happened. And with the compiled >> version, came the requirement for PyOpenSSL, and the conflict >> with Python 3.4. > >> So in any case, gajim 0.16 is problematic because MUC does not >> work and gajim 0.15 or gajim source are not available for >> compilation. > >> == hk > > > If you want i could build 0.15 version of gajim to [pcr] and rename > it as gajim-lts >
Also i have a question about it, is there a stable version of gajim? Maybe we could build a new one based on it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUy4KKAAoJEOaXR1L5cERWHT4QALC7sp0zSUu5GnSNt+UbYIq9 w+sowLsoDJXz4VjI0VvYmj5f1kLmgdHhP3DKenRgHIJINcyFkkWno5odlTxPU4ZC 2fCNYJHCZyiMk1T5DWZKgivo6w+r68iZC+n6LMBD7EfiURuy93U9CUW25/MiuNL6 O6cvuJJXr75DHM49uBGmAyEsZl8SoWsNNejD3thaGpoCE+R8ZT2hIovt0AJPXbG/ M2MAajZcYeGG8DwhvYF4miNCthsy7p0ayaT7oGvyEEJF6QTn6uFm5fTOEDX+0P/J AM2hD4nvxgAL4/GHMtEgOG0JmVFCsh1QFoF9kyBP5rytfMt8FUGOkQiNf6pFa1Pp js4kHbCxK7FglVPcRlga/CqDN38r5qdJRLKXIUrQUIUusuP5z9dHwKnBGcaMK0Ez GXMafkn3I9USM5drGVshLyfZ4Oztk3fOUKceUeSpUt2TyzZdj4K0jAwR48Ld9acP N1v5IEspXFCZbs2ob40Tiq01zZ0Havc0VVVYLqyP1Y0WUYTQxEUqJzey/pOl4Tpt cx5h3uyB5FkTEMPrWMWDuzz05HlIoGSaaCfoErerNNwL9tmG51igJ4B9HGHuy9BK PUcyAPE99NiIyJCMvjxNr75v8eEvR7ISQlpYaBiZAMvu9eMuN0jYMQriJ54u38QE VgLAKl+QUC2Ukz0aVjf4 =LS8w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
