-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 01/30/2015 10:09 AM, André Silva wrote: > >> If you want i could build 0.15 version of gajim to [pcr] and rename >> it as gajim-lts > *** That would require reviewing their code and ensuring there's no security issue in 0.15.
> Also i have a question about it, is there a stable version of gajim? > Maybe we could build a new one based on it. > *** 0.16 is the "stable" one. Not sure they realized the regression yet. But I'm more concerned about the conflict in the Python packages from 2.7 and 3.4. Why is there a conflict between a file from python 2.7 and one from python3.4? == hk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUy6DiXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0 ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9crgP/3WSR4K3ZiZMgp9y32PPgC9y qVAgUOND3PryEq1nzHPllxlZUyaJUNjd/Kh1DxNOqDeoekpdfCrMgsLMWR8OmNk/ CTR7W7oqf1qqxGui/Ls3JhHmGb67ZnV+0iJkcBFhs1TFIwOm2Cv8oUJtYz+wCDWW JEeR91Uz1RGcAsSDeS/um3bitceArDeDiXCaplF8lrylKPMGfOX+kZVzJIOqKW02 htMah2vXnwMyeQFbqdJhM5n3V9OJLX/1Uy+0sSrLhut8Kjh3OXPYTl2eEV5HUHhY tsavMJoq2WdmQUDgCuwDTQanoHh6ffV3LA7dktHZUXlLFLKrUfGdmnimBEzUbUVH QTXV29DMkqC76Iosapc8ULE6UQFNt4IRp+58T+tT6pmAufXf/EaaxVInzTGZ1+mr 6C6qTQ8PkJh4G+Oq3U4cRTmGP1GoNr+7uyHYFLd7zgCTvpkpGbRGizPBhO9T4PMH CUr91HzChVKubclYzFtk7cB8X1KR4vfIXqf7Po+nyG0bGbNgIn/V+A9eF+iQgFn4 xjTV//D6kcDp+HjB84SuWlBQ9juSns8x6BfiQuqoHeC3uZ0eEvtIz+CwyJnzmC/g eAYZRX21P5BjK34oGrsoRMOEG+V36rdDw5tUSh/b7qG/rSIRsf+jtr3vYw/i8t+A oNRWJ66HedERQGiGyn1q =OCQb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
