Hi guys, Sorry I'm about a week late on this... I'm proving to be increasingly terrible at time management and juggling my commitments. I suck.
Anyway, I support the proposal up to this point in the thread At Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:07:53 -0300, Nicolás Reynolds wrote: > hellekin <[email protected]> writes: > > This last step is what needs to be accountable but opaque. The details > > of the communication between the delegate and CEATA are irrelevant to > > the process that is public otherwise. It's important to have a record > > of it, but the role of a delegate is exactly to avoid having many voices > > raised during a conversation. > > that's why the propposed list was closed to posts. I support the publicly-read-only list, but believe that ultimately that detail should be up to the delegate. Obviosly, fauno currently supports the list. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
