On 07/19/2015 12:10 PM, fauno wrote: > > we haven't reach a consensus on payed developers, so the funds ceata is > going to hold for us are for expenses such as domain names, servers, > hardware, etc. > I suggest re-open a consensus about payed Parabola hackers. It should reach a consensus to know that we should do with it after Parabola structuring.
I had plans to do a presentation about our distro [0] for health institutions and ONGs to offers a dedicated Parabola technical support for them like GNU Solidario and GNUHealth does, but we need people with dedicated time for it, not enthusiasts only. I would do it inside Parabola because i would see hackers won't have to earn their wages by working anywhere else and would have dedicated time to fix long standing bugs and effort to Parabola (eg: create a stable and secure version for hospitals). I agree use the donations for expenses such as domain names, servers, hardware, etc, because we need structuring to organize our distro first, however i'm against it as a definitive way for our donations. [0]:https://wiki.parabola.nu/Parabola_Presentation
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
