On 07/20/2015 05:44 PM, fauno wrote: > i wouldn't like a solution like this, because it'll create the rift > between payed hackers and communitary development we discussed and > feared about a long time ago... with a project that's more of a > product, made for professionals for the needs of their costumers, and a > pet project developed by and for the community that has bugs no one > wants to fix. > > i **insist** in that if we want to accept money and start covering > hardware expenses, developer expenses, and then life expenses, we need > to do it as a community and in transparent way. having to create a side > project with funding and dedicated people is not the way to do it :) > > there's people involving a lot of their time in parabola development, > and after a while it isn't fun anymore (i did it myself!). i'd be happy > to see them make a few bucks for that, but those bucks should be > assigned by the community if this project is going to be democratic and > fun in the future. >
+1 excellent point of view, i didn't paid attention on that detail
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
