It doesn't muddles anything but shows why the logic used to ban the feature is irrational in regard to Free Software principles and goals.
Answering your question: Because it is useful. El lunes 02 de noviembre del 2015 a las 0047 horas, fauno escribió: > Jorge Araya Navarro <[email protected]> writes: > >> Suspicion is good enough criteria, AFAIK. >> >> Again, dependency is not good enough reason. Dependency in a piece of >> hardware that requires >> proprietary software to function is, on the other hand, good enough reason >> to replace *such* >> hardware. >> >> But the server side of Firefox Hello do not affects my four freedoms. >> LibreJS exists because >> proprietary Javascript runs in user's browsers, not because the stack of the >> servers visited by >> those users runs the entire Parabola's black list. > > i was taling about the slippery slope precisely because using other > stuff as examples muddles this particular discussion. > > so, why should we bring back hello to iceweasel? -- 👋 Pax et bonum. Jorge Araya Navarro https://es.gravatar.com/shackra _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
