Florian Pelz <[email protected]> writes: > On 11/04/2015 05:04 PM, fauno wrote: >> our criteria is the parabola social contract (which you can find on the >> wiki). >> > > I want criteria so these political decisions can mostly be made based on > Parabola policy and not vague ideas and long discussions. > > If the Social Contract is all criteria there is for libre, then that > would allow a) some kinds of non-free "non-functional data" such as not > fully free art (cf. the Free System Distribution Guidelines [1]) and it > might also allow b) SaaSS like Firefox Hello. While Stallman describes > SaaSS as taking away freedom, I fail to see how the FSDG make it > forbidden, so Hello should be allowed in libre. > > The Social Contract also says nothing about nonprism. I think my > proposed criteria for nonprism are appropriate.
mmm i thought we put it on the social contract that we also support free culture so non optional non modifiable art/data is not considered ok, unlike the fsdg does. (think of cc-nd game art, not gnu fdl covers or unmodifiable sections...) where did we point this out? -- http://librevpn.org.ar
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
