Jorge Araya Navarro <[email protected]> writes: > I really hate the next phrase, because when someone else says it > sounds pedantic, but here it comes: patches are welcome. There is > nothing inherently bad with loop-server that forbids anyone to modify > its source code (or to exercise any of the other three freedoms) to > make loop-server work with any Free Software WebRTC backend, so, > nobody is *really* lock because there is nothing legally speaking that > prevents someone with the knowledge to do the mentioned > changes. Objectively speaking, we are dealing with Free[1] > Software[2].
i think no one is saying that it's impossible to **theoretically** use firefox hello with libre software, just that **currently** it isn't possible without ultimately depending on tokbox's proprietary platform. > Tox looks awesome, however, people is damn lazy. we don't care for lazyness but for software freedom, no? are we removing firefox hello from our iceweasel in a way that prevents people to use it if they want? if we do, i suggest we remove hello in a way that can be enabled by user choice, since there's no proprietary code to remove, just like google safe browsing. (i won't digress on the lazyness of parabola users...) -- http://librevpn.org.ar
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
