On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote: >> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good >> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they >> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead. >> >> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux', we will >> maintain a good relationship with Arch guys, if we put 'Arch GNU/Linux', >> we will maintain a good relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard >> Stallman. What should we use? good question and big problem. > > What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
+1 I agree with your suggestion because it solves this issue for the Social Contract. >> Otherwise, shouldn't all clauses in our Social Contract be revised under >> a lawyer too? Maybe FSF or Fundatia Ceata (through Tiberiu) could help >> us on it. > > Why do you need a lawyer? I think we need a lawyer to see if it needs more clarification and avoid contradictions in our clauses.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
