On 06/09/2016 07:46 PM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote: >>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good >>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they >>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead. >>> >>> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux', we will >>> maintain a good relationship with Arch guys, if we put 'Arch GNU/Linux', >>> we will maintain a good relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard >>> Stallman. What should we use? good question and big problem. >> What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"? > +1 I agree with your suggestion because it solves this issue for the > Social Contract. > > If FSF and Arch Team is ok with calling it that, I think it is a good compromise. That way people will know it is the GNU/Linux distro named Arch and avoid the entire naming controversy to begin with.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
