I can host the keys 2016-07-08 14:20 جرينتش-07:00, Luke Shumaker <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 08 Jul 2016 16:17:22 -0400, > fauno wrote: >> >> [1 <multipart/signed (7bit)>] >> [1.1 <text/plain (quoted-printable)>] >> Luke Shumaker <[email protected]> writes: >> > Who do we give this data to? If it's encrypted, who holds the >> > decryption keys? How long do we retain backups for? How often do we >> > make them? >> >> i've been using backupninja+duplicity with good results, and you can >> gpg encrypt to several keys so there's no single point of failure > > AFAICT, duplicity differentiates between incremental and full backups, > which means that periodically we'd need to make a new full backup > instead of having to step through every incremental backup. That's > fine I guess, but I'd rather have full backups with deduplication, > like tarsnap or bup. Of course, tarsnap is nonfree, and bup is > immature. > > (+10 internet points to whoever writes a Free clone of tarsnap.) > > But also: I think the more important question to answer is "where does > the data go"? Where will we host it? > > -- > Happy hacking, > ~ Luke Shumaker > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >
-- Emacs is the ground. We run around and act silly on top of it, and when we die, may our remnants grace its ongoing incrementation. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
