On 07/18/16 15:17, fauno wrote: > IngeGNUe <[email protected]> writes: >> If you can have that solution working then another thing that would be >> nice to have is a distributed backup solution in which multiple specific >> people can access the data, without it being accessible by the whole >> world. Distributed data storage seems the most ideal to me in terms of >> respecting Parabola's horizontal organization. >> >> The challenge is how to grant access. >> >> What do you think of Tahoe-LAFS? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tahoe-LAFS > > fwiw, tahoe-lafs is a pain in the ass to package (it has many many many > python dependencies) and i never could find in any doc if it behaves > like a real filesystem or if it's just a web panel. > > anyway for synchronizing files i prefer syncthing which is much more > simpler to configure, you just exchange fingerprints. > > as for encrypting backups, i'd go for kiss :P >
I like your idea... What would be the KISS way of encrypting the backups though? _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
