Le ven. 7 avril 2017 à 16:37, hellekin <[email protected]> a écrit :
How comes adhocracy and consensus went to shit when it came to handling money?
well, no consensus was required to cancel the agreement, and I fail to see how either of those concepts applied to donations and their handling.
Blaming Ceata for that
who are you citing exactly?
when they only performed as they said
nobody claimed they didn't. the claim was that they couldn't do nearly as much as some hackers wanted from them. ergo the call for considering cancelling the agreement.
now you have to find another one within 2 months (good luck with that)
https://git.parabola.nu/~~historic/ceata-agreement.git/tree/Parabola+Ceata_Agreement.markdown section 7.c, "Termination Without a Fiscal Sponsor Successor" simply says funds stay frozen until a new sponsor is found. 60 days is the grace period between notification and actual cancellation. there's nothing in the terms per se to worry about.
I only hope the Parabola community can survive your selfish brat behavior.
I hope you aren't implying that some of our most active contributors are selfish brats for the sin of wanting to actually benefit from donations. that would be on a whole new level of nonsense. -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
