Dear all, I do not participate much to the newsletter (I only mirror), but I can feel the tension of the conversation.
Since we have less than 2 months to find a fiscal sponsorship, I would prefer to focus there. Even if there is fees, it is probably better to reach out to others fiscal sponsors. By the way, using a fiscal sponsorship is not something all opensource software are doing, and probably most of them are using a legal entity as an association or something like this depending of the country. At that time, was it done to solve a particular issue? The main issues I'm seeing are, you need some paperwork / admin (But mostly at the startup and once a year) and probably the most troublesome in some cases, donations are not tax deductible. But after, it's very flexible, tranparent, etc.. Just asking and trying to help :) On 9 April 2017 at 04:30, Omar Vega Ramos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I just wanted to take a moment to say that while questions were being > > asked by members of our community, no one has made the public the > > decision to "terminate". > > However, as Ceata has already made this decision for us (which is > > allowed per ยง7), it will be unlikely to find a replacement within 60 > days. > > > > As for current consensus: > > I think we should immediately remove donation links from the website to > > avoid further loss/confusion of Parabola donations until this matter is > > resolved. > > +1 > > -- > Omar Vega Ramos > GPG ID: 6D5DBA58 > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
