Since lukeshu kindly reminded me in a private email that I am not a dev. and therefore somewhat out of my element, I must kindly ask you guys to remove my email address from this list (I've already unsubscribed), since none of this is any of my business (as I was kindly made aware of).
Thank you in advanced. S On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:38:39PM -0400, Luke wrote: > On 04/14/2017 05:44 PM, fauno wrote: > > Josh Branning <[email protected]> writes: > >> Really, it's up to GC4J to choose to what entity the build server will > >> be donated to, if it is to be donated. > > so a few issues to be solved: > > > > * is g4jc build server donation a donation to parabola or to > > emulatorman? > > The donation is intended for Emulatorman (since he is currently the one > maintaining kernels and has access to fiber). Assuming that Emulatorman > remains with Parabola (current consensus seems that way), it will > benefit Parabola which still is the intention. > > > > * if it's a donation to parabola, do we give it to emulatorman to host > > or some other parabola hacker could host it instead? > > > > * do we want to pay the shipment price? does it still amount to 400 > > USD? > > Since it will be shipping within the US the shipping does not equal $400 > USD. It should cost < $300. > > In any case, it is my understanding that the money is temporarily > 'frozen' until a new sponsor is found. So, I will pay for the shipping. > > > > * do we want to buy an ups to accompany this build server? > > It would be nice, but I assume this is something that can be bought > locally. It may also be possible to buy a used one and replace the > battery at a reduced cost. > > > > * who will have remote access to this build server? > > All core developers should have access to the build server, but I am not > sure that everyone needs sudo. It may be possible to simply "queue" jobs > for the server to do. > > I know lukeshu has some good ideas on this, so I like forward to seeing > what he may have in mind. It may also be useful to have an audit log of > commands which are run on the server and by whom to avoid confusion and > increase transparency. > > > > > * other questions people can have > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
