wael, you replied only to me, not the mailing list - mind the CC
list - clients usually have a "reply to all" or "reply to list"
button


On Sun, 05 Mar 2023 18:32:29 +0200 Wael wrote:
> Though, at that point, why not replace it with a coreboot-utils package?
> The whole reason for using libreboot's sources was that no cleanup would be
> needed.

i dunno - i suppose it would make no difference - IIRC, the
discussion began by asking if libreboot should be forked - so,
even that, becomes a dubious question

libreboot is a fork of coreboot, forked specifically to clean
the non-free bits - if libreboot no longer does that, then it
would be silly to fork libreboot - seems like it would be more
sensible to fork coreboot, and name the fork like
'truly-libre-boot'
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to