On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Chris Fordham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This would be mad. A generic RPM would be great!
Just as long as there is a standard .tar.gz for all us people who don't use RPM. > And can someone clarify what no arch is? Does that mean no architecture > ie. there are no binaries in the package? Please correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't an RPM have a pre-defined structure for where the files go? How exactly could you produce an RPM to put RC in a webroot if you don't know where that webroot is when you built the RPM? And if is there is a standard webroot for RPM based distributions, what about the people who don't install RC system wide? Or in a virtual hosted domain? I could be wrong in my assumptions about RPM (given that I tend to avoid anything RPM related like the plague), but I just can't see how it would work. D. -- Ubuntu (Noun): I can't figure out how to configure Slackware.
